SOC as a Service Singapore
24/7 SOC as a Service for Singapore Companies - MDR, SIEM, MAS TRM & PDPA Aligned Monitoring
Praxis-Q delivers 24/7 SOC-as-a-Service for Singapore organisations - managed detection and response, SIEM, threat hunting and incident response aligned to MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines, Cyber Security Agency (CSA) expectations, and PDPA breach-notification timelines.
At a Glance
Coverage
24/7/365
Stack
MDR + SIEM
Frameworks
MAS TRM/PDPA
Market
Singapore
SOCaaS Singapore
SOC as a Service Singapore
24/7 SOC as a Service for Singapore Companies - MDR, SIEM, MAS TRM & PDPA Aligned Monitoring
The Problem
Threats run 24/7 and MAS TRM Guidelines expect continuous monitoring most Singapore teams cannot staff in-house, especially outside business hours.
What We Do
- Onboard
- Detect
- Triage
- Respond
- Report
What You Get
- 24/7/365 monitoring and threat detection
- Managed detection and response (MDR)
- SIEM correlation and threat intelligence
- MAS TRM Guidelines continuous-monitoring evidence
- CSA cybersecurity alignment
- Incident response mapped to PDPA 3-day breach notification
Why weeks, not months
AI-assisted evidence review, one client portal
Every SOCaaS Singapore engagement runs on the Praxis-Q compliance platform. You upload evidence per control, AI scores it against the requirement, and your auditor reviews in the same workflow — from scoping through to the issued, publicly verifiable certificate.
AI evidence scoring
Every upload is scored against the control before an auditor sees it — gaps surface in minutes, not at the review meeting.
One client portal
Scoping, evidence, auditor queries and status live in one place. No email chains, no spreadsheet trackers.
Auditor sign-off
Praxis-Q auditors review inside the same workflow, so review rounds shrink and the certificate issues sooner.
24/7 monitoring built around the PDPC's 3-day clock
Detection and initial triage run continuously specifically because the PDPA's notification window starts running from the point a breach is assessed as notifiable, not from when it's convenient to check logs - the SOC is structured to compress the detection-to-assessment timeline as much as possible.
Alert triage and materiality assessment support
Not every alert is a notifiable breach, and treating every incident as PDPC-reportable would be both wrong and unsustainable. Our analysts support the initial materiality triage so your team can focus its formal breach-assessment process on the alerts that genuinely warrant it.
Incident response and containment support
Confirmed incidents get real-time containment and remediation guidance from our analysts, working from a pre-agreed runbook so the response doesn't stall while your team figures out the right move under pressure.
Supporting MAS TRM and ISO 27001 evidence
For regulated financial institutions, monitoring and incident records feed the detection and reporting expectations in MAS's Technology Risk Management Guidelines; for organisations pursuing ISO 27001, the same records satisfy Annex A's monitoring and incident management controls.
Onboarding and detection tuning
Initial onboarding tunes detection rules to your actual environment to reduce false-positive volume, since a SOC that generates too much noise either gets ignored or exhausts the team meant to be relying on it.
SIEM and SOC Are Not the Same Purchase
A SIEM is a platform that collects, correlates and retains security events. A SOC is the people and process who act on what it produces. Buying the first without the second is the most common failure in this market and it is visible to any assessor: the logging requirement is satisfied and the monitoring requirement is not. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 makes the split explicit by separating A.8.15 Logging from A.8.16 Monitoring activities. Where Singapore organisations ask for SIEM services, the question we ask back is who reviews the alerts tomorrow morning - because that answer decides the architecture.
Platform Choice and Data Residency
Praxis-Q runs Wazuh, Elastic/OpenSearch and Graylog/Security Onion in production, and platform selection follows the estate rather than a licence: endpoint-heavy environments point at Wazuh, high-volume firewall and appliance logging at Graylog, packet-level evidence at Security Onion, and existing Elastic deployments at Elastic or OpenSearch. Where contractual or sectoral obligations constrain where logs may be stored, self-hosting in a Singapore region keeps the data inside the jurisdiction - one practical reason organisations choose an owned stack over a subscription that ships telemetry to a region they do not control. The SIEM is yours under both delivery models: build-and-hand-over, where we train your team to run it, or managed, where our analysts do.
Retention Sizing
Retention multiplied by measured daily volume is what sizes the platform and the cost. Where PCI DSS applies alongside MAS expectations, v4.0.1 requirement 10.5.1 sets twelve months of audit log history with at least the most recent three months immediately available for analysis - a hot and warm tier, not twelve months of hot storage. We size from two weeks of sampled real collection rather than an estimate, because retention cannot be retrofitted and data you did not keep is gone.