Fast-Track · Weeks, Not Months

GDPR Compliance EU

EU GDPR Compliance Services - EDPB-Aligned, DPA Audit-Ready

Praxis-Q delivers EU GDPR compliance for organizations processing personal data of EU/EEA residents. Our team implements GDPR-compliant frameworks aligned to EDPB guidelines, individual EU DPA enforcement priorities, Standard Contractual Clauses for international transfers, and the intersection of GDPR with NIS2 and DORA.

Get EU GDPR Certified →Request Proposal

At a Glance

Regulation

GDPR 2016/679

Delivery

10-15 days

Enforcer

EDPB + DPAs

Max Fine

€20M/4%

Book Free Consultation

Organisations established inside the EU face a different practical GDPR posture than those merely selling into it: they fall fully under the one-stop-shop mechanism, deal with a specific lead supervisory authority for cross-border processing, and increasingly sit inside overlapping EU regimes - NIS2 for network and information security, DORA for financial entities - that reuse and extend GDPR's security requirements rather than replace them. Praxis-Q's EU GDPR programme starts by fixing which national DPA is the lead supervisory authority for the client's main establishment, then builds the Article 30 records of processing, DPIA methodology, and breach procedures against that authority's specific enforcement priorities and published guidance, because CNIL, the Datenschutzkonferenz and the Garante privacy each interpret and enforce GDPR with real procedural differences despite the shared legal text.

Serving EU:Penetration Testing & VAPT in EU

EU GDPR

EU GDPR Compliance Services - EDPB-Aligned, DPA Audit-Ready

The Problem

Handling EU personal data without GDPR controls risks fines up to 4% of global turnover. Regulators act on complaints, and not knowing is not a defence.

What We Do

GDPR Gap Analysis
Data Mapping
ROPA & DPIAs
Transfer Mechanisms
DPA Readiness

What You Get

GDPR Article 30 ROPA development
Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIA)
Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) for international transfers
Data Protection Officer (DPO) advisory
EDPB guideline-aligned compliance framework
Breach notification procedures (72-hour DPA reporting)
GDPR and NIS2 integrated compliance programme
Cross-border transfer adequacy decision guidance

Get pricing →

Why weeks, not months

AI-assisted evidence review, one client portal

Every EU GDPR engagement runs on the Praxis-Q compliance platform. You upload evidence per control, AI scores it against the requirement, and your auditor reviews in the same workflow — from scoping through to the issued, publicly verifiable certificate.

AI evidence scoring

Every upload is scored against the control before an auditor sees it — gaps surface in minutes, not at the review meeting.

One client portal

Scoping, evidence, auditor queries and status live in one place. No email chains, no spreadsheet trackers.

Auditor sign-off

Praxis-Q auditors review inside the same workflow, so review rounds shrink and the certificate issues sooner.

How the platform works →Open the portal

The One-Stop-Shop Mechanism and Lead Supervisory Authority

For an organisation with establishments in more than one EU member state, GDPR's one-stop-shop mechanism designates a single lead supervisory authority - typically the DPA where the main establishment (central administration or the location of key decisions on processing) sits - to coordinate cross-border enforcement with the other DPAs concerned via the European Data Protection Board. Getting this wrong is a common and costly error: organisations that assume their local DPA is automatically the lead, without formally establishing where GDPR-relevant decisions are actually made, can find a different authority asserting jurisdiction after a complaint is already filed. Praxis-Q's engagement starts by documenting the organisation's actual decision-making structure to establish lead authority correctly before any incident forces the question.

EDPB Guidelines and National DPA Enforcement Patterns

The European Data Protection Board issues guidelines that all EU DPAs are expected to follow, but enforcement style still varies meaningfully by country - CNIL in France runs frequent, thematic sweeps and publishes formal warnings; the German Datenschutzkonferenz coordinates sixteen state authorities with differing thresholds; Ireland's DPC handles most Big Tech cross-border cases given how many multinationals base their EU establishment there. Praxis-Q builds compliance documentation to EDPB guideline standards as the floor, then layers in the specific documentation style and evidentiary expectations of whichever DPA is the client's actual lead authority, rather than a generic pan-EU template.

GDPR, NIS2 and DORA - Where the Regimes Overlap

NIS2 (in force since October 2024, transposed with varying speed across member states) extends security and incident-reporting obligations to a much wider set of 'essential' and 'important' entities than the original NIS Directive, with security measures that substantially overlap GDPR Article 32's technical and organisational measures. DORA, applicable to EU financial entities and their critical ICT third parties since January 2025, adds its own ICT risk management, incident classification and resilience-testing requirements on top of both. Praxis-Q scopes which of the three regimes actually apply to a given entity and builds one control set - risk register, incident response plan, third-party risk assessments - that produces the specific evidence each regulator asks for, instead of three parallel and partially duplicated compliance programmes.

Standard Contractual Clauses and Transfers Out of the EU

Transfers of EU personal data to a third country without an adequacy decision require a valid transfer mechanism - almost always the European Commission's Standard Contractual Clauses (2021 modular version) - plus, following Schrems II, a documented Transfer Impact Assessment of the destination country's surveillance laws and any supplementary measures needed. Praxis-Q maps every outbound data flow (cloud providers, group intercompany transfers, SaaS vendors), identifies which SCC module applies to each relationship, and produces the TIA documentation DPAs now expect to see on request rather than assume compliant by default.

Engagement Model

Gap assessment against GDPR, mapped to the client's actual lead supervisory authority and any overlapping NIS2/DORA scope, runs 10-15 business days. Deliverables include Article 30 records of processing, a DPIA methodology and worked examples, breach notification procedures calibrated to the 72-hour reporting clock, SCC/TIA documentation for identified transfers, and DPO advisory where Article 37 requires a designated officer. Delivery is remote-first with EU-hours availability for client calls.

Related Services

NIS2 Compliance DORA Compliance ISO 27001 Certification (EU)PCI DSS Compliance (Europe)

Frequently Asked Questions

Does GDPR apply to non-EU companies?

Yes. GDPR applies to any organization worldwide that processes personal data of EU/EEA residents, regardless of where the organization is established. Indian companies, US companies, and UK companies with EU customers must comply with EU GDPR.

What is the EDPB?

The European Data Protection Board is the independent body coordinating GDPR enforcement across all EU member states. EDPB guidelines set the authoritative interpretation of GDPR requirements.

What are the GDPR fines?

GDPR fines reach up to EUR 20 million or 4% of global annual turnover for serious infringements. National DPAs including CNIL (France), BfDI (Germany), and the Data Protection Commission (Ireland) are actively issuing significant fines.

What is the one-stop-shop mechanism and why does it matter?

It's the GDPR provision that gives an organisation with EU establishments in multiple member states a single lead supervisory authority for cross-border processing, coordinated with other concerned DPAs via the EDPB, instead of facing parallel investigations from every country where it operates. Establishing the correct lead authority in advance - based on where processing decisions are actually made, not just where an office happens to be - avoids jurisdictional disputes surfacing for the first time during a complaint investigation.

Do different EU countries enforce GDPR differently?

The legal text is the same across the EU, but enforcement style differs: some DPAs run frequent proactive sweeps and publish frequent formal decisions, others act mainly on complaints, and documentation expectations vary in format and depth. The EDPB issues guidelines meant to harmonise interpretation, but Praxis-Q still builds documentation to the specific style of whichever DPA is the client's lead authority, on top of the EDPB baseline.

How does GDPR interact with NIS2 and DORA for EU entities?

All three overlap on security controls but serve different regulators and scopes. NIS2 extends network-and-information-security and incident-reporting duties to a much broader set of entities than before; DORA adds ICT risk management and resilience testing specifically for financial entities and their critical ICT vendors. GDPR Article 32 sits underneath both as the baseline personal-data security requirement. Praxis-Q scopes which regimes actually apply and builds shared evidence rather than three separate programmes.

What transfer mechanism do we need to move data outside the EU?

In the absence of an EU adequacy decision for the destination country, the European Commission's 2021 modular Standard Contractual Clauses are the standard mechanism, and since the Schrems II ruling they must be paired with a documented Transfer Impact Assessment of the destination's surveillance regime plus any supplementary technical or contractual measures needed. Intercompany transfers need this exactly as much as third-party vendor transfers.

Do we need a Data Protection Officer under EU GDPR?

A DPO is mandatory under Article 37 for public authorities, organisations whose core activities involve large-scale regular and systematic monitoring, or large-scale processing of special category data. Many organisations outside those thresholds appoint one voluntarily for governance reasons. Praxis-Q assesses the Article 37 triggers against actual processing activities and provides DPO-as-a-service where a designated officer is required or advisable.

How long does an EU GDPR gap assessment take?

Typically 10-15 business days for the assessment and roadmap - data mapping, lead-authority determination, Article 30 ROPA review, and identification of DPIA and transfer gaps. Full remediation (policy drafting, SCC/TIA documentation, breach procedures, DPO appointment where required) is scoped separately based on what the assessment finds.

Ready to Get Started?

Tell us the scope and an assessor replies within 24 hours.

View All Services