Fast-Track · Weeks, Not Months

CMMC Compliance USA

CMMC 2.0 Readiness & C3PAO Assessment Preparation for DoD Contractors

Praxis-Q delivers CMMC 2.0 readiness for US defense contractors and the Defense Industrial Base - NIST SP 800-171 gap assessment, System Security Plan (SSP), POA&M, and evidence preparation. We make you assessment-ready; the formal CMMC certification is issued by an accredited C3PAO.

At a Glance

Levels

L1/L2/L3

Basis

NIST 800-171

Delivery

Weeks

Market

USA / DoD

CMMC 2.0's final rule took effect December 16, 2024, giving DoD contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information a three-tier framework - Level 1 (17 foundational safeguarding practices, self-assessed), Level 2 (110 requirements across 14 domains aligned to NIST SP 800-171, most requiring third-party C3PAO certification), and Level 3 (adding NIST SP 800-172 controls for the most sensitive programmes, assessed by the government directly). In July 2026, the Department of War (the renamed Department of Defense) suspended Phase 2 of the rollout - the mandatory third-party certification requirement for Level 2 - and launched a 60-day review of the programme; contractors should treat this as a pause on one specific requirement, not a repeal of the framework, since the underlying NIST SP 800-171 control obligations and the DFARS contract clauses requiring self-assessment remain in force regardless of how the review concludes. Praxis-Q runs gap assessments and remediation against whichever level your specific contracts require, tracking the review's outcome so clients aren't caught flat-footed whichever way it lands.
Who you are working with: Praxis-Q is the compliance and cybersecurity practice of Techtweek Infotech LLC, a Wyoming-registered company, and of PraxisQ Consulting LLP (India). SOC engagements are contracted through the LLC; other services through the LLP (see Terms). Delivery is remote-first from our India practice; email is answered within 24 hours and calls are by appointment. Book a US-hours call or reach the team on +1 917-508-5334.

CMMC USA

CMMC Compliance USA

CMMC 2.0 Readiness & C3PAO Assessment Preparation for DoD Contractors

The Problem

CMMC 2.0 is now mandatory to win or keep DoD contracts. Without it you are locked out of the Defense Industrial Base, and self-attestation no longer cuts it for CUI.

What We Do

  • Scoping
  • Gap Assessment
  • SSP & POA&M
  • Remediation
  • Assessment Prep

What You Get

  • NIST SP 800-171 gap assessment (110 controls)
  • System Security Plan (SSP) development
  • POA&M creation and remediation tracking
  • CUI / FCI scoping and data-flow mapping
  • C3PAO pre-assessment readiness
  • Evidence and artifact preparation
  • Level 1, 2 and 3 readiness
  • Supports DFARS 252.204-7012 / 7019 / 7020

Why weeks, not months

AI-assisted evidence review, one client portal

Every CMMC USA engagement runs on the Praxis-Q compliance platform. You upload evidence per control, AI scores it against the requirement, and your auditor reviews in the same workflow — from scoping through to the issued, publicly verifiable certificate.

AI evidence scoring

Every upload is scored against the control before an auditor sees it — gaps surface in minutes, not at the review meeting.

One client portal

Scoping, evidence, auditor queries and status live in one place. No email chains, no spreadsheet trackers.

Auditor sign-off

Praxis-Q auditors review inside the same workflow, so review rounds shrink and the certificate issues sooner.

CMMC 2.0's Three Levels

Level 1 covers 17 foundational safeguarding practices for contractors handling only Federal Contract Information, verified by annual self-assessment. Level 2 covers 110 security requirements across 14 domains, mapped directly to NIST SP 800-171 Revision 2, for contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information - most Level 2 contracts require third-party certification by a CMMC Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO), though some lower-priority information allows self-assessment. Level 3 adds a further set of enhanced requirements drawn from NIST SP 800-172, reserved for the highest-priority CUI programmes, and assessment is conducted directly by government assessors rather than a C3PAO. Praxis-Q determines the correct target level from your actual contract language and the CUI categories you handle, since guessing wrong either under-invests in required controls or over-invests in certification you don't need.

The Rule Took Effect, But Phase 2 Is Now Suspended

The CMMC Program final rule (32 CFR Part 170) and the companion DFARS acquisition rule (48 CFR) took effect December 16, 2024, and Phase 1 - requiring the CMMC contract clause and Level 1/Level 2 self-assessment flow-down into new contracts - began rolling out from November 2025. In July 2026, the Department of War suspended Phase 2, which would have made third-party C3PAO certification mandatory for most Level 2 contracts, and opened a 60-day review of the programme in response to small-business and industry concerns about assessor capacity and cost. What hasn't changed: contractors are still contractually obligated to implement NIST SP 800-171 controls and self-attest to their compliance status where the contract clause applies. Praxis-Q's advice to clients has been consistent through this: build to the full Level 2 control set regardless of the certification-timeline politics, because the technical requirement isn't what's paused.

NIST SP 800-171 as the Technical Backbone

Whatever happens to the third-party certification timeline, NIST SP 800-171's 110 security requirements are the actual technical substance behind Level 2, covering access control, awareness and training, audit and accountability, configuration management, incident response, and eight other domains. Contractors need a System Security Plan (SSP) documenting how each requirement is met and a Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) for any gaps not yet closed - both of which any assessor, self-assessment reviewer, or eventual C3PAO will expect to see regardless of the current phase-in status. Praxis-Q builds the SSP and POA&M as the core deliverable of every CMMC engagement, since it's the artifact that actually gets scrutinised.

C3PAO Assessments in a Suspended-Phase-2 Market

The suspension has left the C3PAO assessment market in a genuinely unsettled state - contractors who had scheduled certification assessments are seeing them paused or rescheduled, and the accreditation body overseeing C3PAOs is itself waiting on the review's outcome before issuing further guidance. Praxis-Q's position for clients caught in this gap is to keep remediation and evidence-collection work moving on the assumption that some form of third-party verification returns in some form, rather than stopping work and having to restart from scratch once the review concludes - the NIST SP 800-171 gap-closure work doesn't become wasted effort under any plausible outcome of the review.

Engagement Model and Timeline

Gap assessment against the applicable CMMC level typically runs two to three weeks; SSP and POA&M development and control remediation take considerably longer depending on how mature the existing environment is against NIST SP 800-171. Praxis-Q delivers this work regardless of Level 2's current certification-timeline status, since the underlying control requirements are unaffected, and tracks the Department of War's review outcome to advise clients on next steps as soon as it's published.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CMMC mandatory for DoD contracts?
Yes. Under CMMC 2.0, contractors and subcontractors handling FCI or CUI must meet the applicable CMMC level as a condition of award, phased into contracts through 2026.
Does Praxis-Q issue the CMMC certificate?
No - and no consultant can. CMMC Level 2/3 certification is issued only by an accredited C3PAO. Praxis-Q delivers the readiness, SSP, POA&M and evidence so you pass that assessment first time.
What is the difference between CMMC levels?
Level 1 covers basic FCI safeguarding (self-assessed). Level 2 aligns to the 110 NIST SP 800-171 controls for CUI (C3PAO-assessed). Level 3 adds NIST SP 800-172 enhanced controls for high-priority programs.
What does a CMMC consultant do before the C3PAO assessment?
Scope the CUI boundary, run the NIST SP 800-171 gap assessment against all 110 controls, build the System Security Plan and POA&M, close the gaps that fail the Level 2 scoring rules, and run a mock assessment so the C3PAO visit holds no surprises. Praxis-Q is not a C3PAO; we prepare you for one and support you during the assessment.
Is CMMC still required now that Phase 2 is suspended?
The suspension paused the mandatory third-party C3PAO certification requirement specifically - it did not repeal the CMMC Program rule or the underlying NIST SP 800-171 control obligations. Contractors still need to meet the requirements for their contract's required level and should continue self-assessment and remediation work regardless of when or how third-party certification resumes.
What are the three CMMC 2.0 levels?
Level 1 (17 foundational practices, annual self-assessment, for Federal Contract Information only), Level 2 (110 requirements across 14 domains aligned to NIST SP 800-171, mostly requiring third-party certification, for Controlled Unclassified Information), and Level 3 (adds NIST SP 800-172 enhanced requirements, government-assessed, for the highest-priority CUI programmes).
What is NIST SP 800-171 and how does it relate to CMMC?
NIST SP 800-171 is the underlying technical standard - its 110 security requirements across 14 domains are exactly what CMMC Level 2 assesses against. CMMC didn't invent new technical controls; it created a formal assessment and certification structure (self-assessment or C3PAO) around compliance that was already contractually required under DFARS clauses referencing NIST SP 800-171.
Do we still need a C3PAO given the Phase 2 suspension?
It depends on your specific contract and where the review lands, which is genuinely unsettled right now. Praxis-Q recommends continuing gap remediation and SSP/POA&M development regardless, since that work is required under any plausible outcome of the review - only the third-party certification mechanism and timeline are actually in question.
What happens to contractors who already completed a C3PAO assessment?
Existing certifications are expected to remain valid; the suspension affects the forward rollout of the mandatory certification requirement for contracts that haven't yet gone through it, not certifications already issued. Contractors already certified should continue maintaining their control environment as normal.
What's the realistic timeline to get CMMC-ready?
Gap assessment runs two to three weeks. Full remediation to close NIST SP 800-171 gaps varies widely - organisations with mature IT security practices might close gaps in a couple of months, while those starting from a limited security programme can take considerably longer. Praxis-Q scopes a realistic timeline after the gap assessment rather than quoting a generic number upfront.

Ready to Get Started?

Tell us the scope and an assessor replies within 24 hours.

Free gap analysis · Proposal in 24 hours · No obligation