Fast-Track · Weeks, Not Months

SSAE 18

SSAE 18 / SOC 1 Type 1 and Type 2 Attestation

SSAE 18 is supervised by the AICPA and regulates how service organizations report on their compliance control measures. Praxis-Q delivers SOC 1 / SSAE 18 readiness and control implementation; the formal report is issued by an independent licensed CPA firm.

Get SSAE 18 Certified →Request Proposal

At a Glance

Standard

AICPA SSAE 18

Report type

SOC 1

Delivery

Weeks

Scope

Financial controls

Book Free Consultation

Praxis-Q delivers comprehensive SSAE 18 compliance and SOC 1 readiness across India and global markets. SSAE 18 (Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 18), supervised by the AICPA, mandates how service organizations report on internal controls affecting financial reporting. Our 15-20 business day fast-track approach combines control assessment, design validation, and operational testing—culminating in SOC 1 Type I or Type II reports issued by independent licensed CPA firms. Essential for Indian IT companies, BPOs, and financial service providers serving US-listed enterprises, SSAE 18 attestation eliminates audit questionnaire burden, strengthens stakeholder trust, and ensures compliance with AICPA standards. Praxis-Q's expertise spans financial controls scoping, control effectiveness evaluation, and end-to-end attestation delivery.

Who issues the certificate: Praxis-Q delivers readiness, implementation and audit support. The formal certification for SSAE 18 (SOC 1 and SOC 2) is issued by Percilchofe CPA LLC, holding Wyoming Board of Certified Public Accountants firm permit no. 1188 (current) and enrolled in the AICPA Peer Review Program (firm no. 900256001833); its Washington-state-licensed CPA performs and signs the attestation - under AICPA rules a SOC report can only be signed by a licensed CPA firm, never by a consultancy. Verify the firm permit on the Wyoming CPA Board, or read how to check a certificate is genuine.

SSAE 18

SSAE 18 / SOC 1 Type 1 and Type 2 Attestation

The Problem

Your customers auditors need assurance over the controls you operate on their behalf. Without an SSAE 18 report, you become the weak link in their audit.

What We Do

Scoping
Assessment
Testing
Report
Delivery

What You Get

Required for financial service providers
AICPA-supervised attestation standard
SOC 1 Type I & Type II report support
Financial reporting controls covered
Required by enterprise clients
Builds trust with stakeholders
Reduces audit questionnaire burden
International recognition

Get pricing →

Why weeks, not months

AI-assisted evidence review, one client portal

Every SSAE 18 engagement runs on the Praxis-Q compliance platform. You upload evidence per control, AI scores it against the requirement, and your auditor reviews in the same workflow — from scoping through to the issued, publicly verifiable certificate.

AI evidence scoring

Every upload is scored against the control before an auditor sees it — gaps surface in minutes, not at the review meeting.

One client portal

Scoping, evidence, auditor queries and status live in one place. No email chains, no spreadsheet trackers.

Auditor sign-off

Praxis-Q auditors review inside the same workflow, so review rounds shrink and the certificate issues sooner.

How the platform works →Open the portal

What Is SSAE 18 & Why It Matters

SSAE 18 (Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 18) replaced SAS 70, establishing the framework for service organizations to report on internal controls over financial reporting. Supervised by the AICPA, this standard ensures transparency and trust in how third-party service providers—including Indian IT firms, BPOs, and outsourcing centers—manage client financial data. SOC 1 reports under SSAE 18 serve as critical trust anchors for enterprises handling sensitive financial information, reducing repetitive client audits and demonstrating AICPA-compliant control environments.

Praxis-Q's Fast-Track SSAE 18 Approach

Our 15-20 business day delivery model accelerates SOC 1 readiness without compromising rigor. We scope financial controls precisely, assess design effectiveness, test operational controls over defined periods, and coordinate independent CPA issuance of Type I or Type II reports. From India to global markets, our compliance specialists ensure your control environment aligns with AICPA standards, reducing audit friction and enabling seamless client onboarding. This rapid turnaround is backed by deep India+global delivery expertise.

SOC 1 Type I vs. Type II: Choose Your Path

Type I reports validate control design and implementation at a point in time—ideal for demonstrating readiness. Type II extends evaluation over 6-12 months, proving sustained operational effectiveness. Praxis-Q guides you through both pathways, aligning with your enterprise clients' audit requirements. Financial service providers, outsourced accounting teams, and cloud platforms benefit from Type II's comprehensive evidence of control reliability. We manage the entire journey from scoping through independent attestation.

Who Needs SSAE 18 Compliance

Service organizations handling financial data for US-listed companies must have SSAE 18 attestation. This includes Indian IT companies, BPOs, financial process outsourcers, shared service centers, and cloud providers. Enterprise clients—particularly in banking, insurance, and public accounting—require SOC 1 reports as contract conditions. Praxis-Q helps Indian and global service providers meet these non-negotiable standards, reducing client questionnaire fatigue and enabling trust-based partnerships.

Control Areas & Financial Scope

SSAE 18 focuses on controls over financial reporting: journal entry authorization, account reconciliation, transaction processing, financial close procedures, and data security. Praxis-Q assesses design effectiveness and operational performance across your scoped control environment. Our India-based teams partner with licensed CPAs to issue binding attestation reports. We ensure controls map to AICPA criteria, reducing gaps and ensuring your SOC 1 report withstands client and external auditor scrutiny.

A US Entity and a Licensed CPA Firm Behind Every SOC 1 Report

Praxis-Q operates a US entity registered in Wyoming alongside its India delivery team, so US buyers contract, invoice and escalate within a US legal framework. The SOC 1 report itself is signed by an independent, licensed US CPA firm we partner with - under AICPA attestation standards only a licensed CPA firm can issue it, and any consultancy claiming to sign its own SSAE 18 report should be questioned. Praxis-Q owns readiness, control design, evidence collection and audit management; the CPA firm performs and signs the attestation. One engagement, two accountable parties, no gap between the consultant who prepared you and the auditor who signed.

SSAE 18 vs SOC 2: Key Differences

While both stem from AICPA standards, SSAE 18 and SOC 2 serve different purposes. SSAE 18 governs SOC 1 reports, which focus on internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) - relevant when your service affects a client's financial statements. SOC 2 reports, issued under AT-C 105/205, evaluate controls against the five Trust Services Criteria (security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy) - relevant to data protection and operational security. Many service organizations need both: SOC 1 (SSAE 18) for financial-impacting controls and SOC 2 for security assurance. Praxis-Q scopes and delivers both attestations, mapping shared controls once to reduce duplicate effort.

Related Services

What is an SSAE 18 report? (guide)SSAE 18 / SOC 1 vs SOC 2 Type 2 SOC 2 Type II Attestation Cloud Security Assessment PCI DSS Compliance Services vCISO Strategic Leadership Data Protection & Controls

Frequently Asked Questions

What is SSAE 18?

SSAE 18 (Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 18) replaced SAS 70. It governs how service organizations report on internal controls affecting financial reporting.

Who needs SSAE 18?

Service organizations that handle financial data of US-listed companies or their clients - including Indian IT companies, BPOs, and financial service providers.

What is the difference between SOC 1 Type 1 and SOC 1 Type 2?

A SOC 1 Type 1 report gives an opinion on whether your controls over financial reporting are suitably designed at a single point in time. A SOC 1 Type 2 report covers a review period, usually 6 to 12 months, and gives an opinion on whether those controls also operated effectively throughout it. Both are issued under SSAE 18. User auditors almost always ask for Type 2, because a point-in-time opinion tells them nothing about the period they are auditing.

Is SOC 1 the same as SOC 2?

No. SOC 1 covers internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and is written for your client’s financial auditors. SOC 2 covers the AICPA Trust Services Criteria - security, availability, confidentiality, processing integrity and privacy - and is written for security and procurement teams. If you are asked for controls that affect your client’s financial statements, you need SOC 1 under SSAE 18. If you are asked to prove security posture, you need SOC 2. Some service organizations are asked for both.

Does SSAE 18 replace SSAE 16?

Yes. SSAE 18 superseded SSAE 16 for report periods ending on or after 1 May 2017. The main practical change is the requirement to formally assess and monitor subservice organizations - your own vendors now fall inside the scope of your report.

What is a SOC 1 Type 2 report?

A SOC 1 Type 2 report is an SSAE 18 attestation in which an independent CPA firm tests whether your controls relevant to clients' financial reporting operated effectively over a review period, usually six to twelve months. A Type 1 only confirms the controls were designed and in place on a single date. Clients' auditors ask for Type 2 because it covers the period their own financial statements span. Praxis-Q prepares the control description, runs the readiness test and evidence collection, and the independent licensed US CPA firm issues the Type 2 report.

Our small startup needs to share an SSAE 18 attestation - what is the easiest way?

Three routes, cheapest first. (1) If you run on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, share the provider's SOC 1 report for the infrastructure layer and a short bridge letter describing the controls you own on top of it; many customers accept that for low-risk services. (2) Scope a SOC 1 Type 1 on only the processes that touch the client's financial data - a narrow scope with five to ten control objectives can be ready in weeks and gives you a CPA-signed report to share. (3) Convert to Type 2 after a six-month operating period so the next renewal is not blocked. Praxis-Q scopes the narrowest report your customer will accept and the CPA firm signs it.

Who actually signs the SOC 1 / SSAE 18 report - Praxis-Q or a CPA firm?

An independent, licensed US CPA firm signs it. AICPA rules allow only a licensed CPA firm to issue an SSAE 18 attestation report, so Praxis-Q does not sign reports - we deliver readiness, control design, evidence and audit management, then manage the examination with our partner CPA firm. Our US entity in Wyoming means US clients engage under US contract terms. Treat any consultancy that claims to issue its own SOC 1 report as a red flag. For the standard itself see what an SSAE 18 report is; for SOC 1 vs SOC 2 see which report your buyer is asking for.

Is SSAE 18 the same as a SOC 2 report?

No. SSAE 18 is the AICPA attestation standard behind SOC 1 reports, which cover internal controls over financial reporting. SOC 2 reports evaluate controls against the Trust Services Criteria (security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy). SSAE 18 answers whether your controls affect a client's financial statements; SOC 2 answers whether your data and systems are secure. Organizations serving finance-impacting and security-sensitive clients often need both.

What is SSAE 18 and how does it differ from SAS 70?

SSAE 18 (Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements No. 18) is the AICPA standard that replaced SAS 70. It governs how service organizations report on internal controls affecting financial reporting. SSAE 18 strengthens attestation requirements, expands management responsibility, and increases auditor independence standards, making SOC 1 reports more rigorous and credible for enterprise stakeholders.

Who specifically needs a SOC 1 SSAE 18 audit?

Service organizations handling financial data of US-listed companies require SSAE 18 compliance. This includes Indian IT companies, BPOs, financial process outsourcers, shared service centers, cloud providers, and third-party custodians. Enterprise clients—banks, insurers, public accounting firms—mandate SOC 1 reports in contracts. Praxis-Q helps Indian and global providers achieve and maintain AICPA attestation.

What's included in Praxis-Q's SSAE 18 delivery?

Our end-to-end service includes control scoping, design assessment, operational testing over your defined period, and coordination with independent licensed CPAs for formal SOC 1 Type I or Type II report issuance. We deliver management assertion documentation, control narratives, testing evidence, and the final AICPA-compliant attestation report—all within 15-20 business days.

How long does SSAE 18 compliance take with Praxis-Q?

Praxis-Q's fast-track model delivers SOC 1 readiness in 15-20 business days—significantly faster than industry standard 60-90 day timelines. Our India HQ and global delivery team streamlines scoping, assessment, testing, and CPA coordination without sacrificing rigor or AICPA compliance standards.

What controls fall within SSAE 18 scope?

SSAE 18 covers internal controls over financial reporting, including journal entry authorization, account reconciliation, transaction processing, financial close procedures, IT access controls, and data security. Praxis-Q helps you define the precise scope aligned with your service delivery model and client requirements, ensuring SOC 1 reports address material risks.

Can Praxis-Q help with SOC 1 Type I and Type II audits?

Yes. Type I validates control design and implementation at a point in time. Type II extends evaluation over 6-12 months, proving sustained operational effectiveness. Praxis-Q guides both pathways, coordinating with independent CPAs to issue formal SOC 1 reports. Type II is typically preferred by enterprise clients requiring deeper control reliability evidence.

Ready to Get Started?

Tell us the scope and an assessor replies within 24 hours.

View All Services