Source Code Analysis
Manual & Automated Secure Code Review
Our source code analysis combines SAST tools with expert manual review to identify security vulnerabilities in your codebase before they reach production - covering all major programming languages.
At a Glance
Method
SAST + Manual
Languages
10+
Delivery
5-10 days
Coverage
OWASP + CWE
Code Review
Source Code Analysis
Manual & Automated Secure Code Review
The Problem
Vulnerabilities are cheapest to fix in code and most expensive in production. Without secure review, the same flaws ship release after release.
What We Do
- Scoping
- SAST Scan
- Manual Review
- Analysis
- Report
What You Get
- Manual expert code review
- SAST tool integration
- All major languages supported
- CWE and OWASP coverage
- Security anti-pattern detection
- Third-party library assessment
- Secure coding recommendations
- Developer training included
Why weeks, not months
AI-assisted evidence review, one client portal
Every Code Review engagement runs on the Praxis-Q compliance platform. You upload evidence per control, AI scores it against the requirement, and your auditor reviews in the same workflow — from scoping through to the issued, publicly verifiable certificate.
AI evidence scoring
Every upload is scored against the control before an auditor sees it — gaps surface in minutes, not at the review meeting.
One client portal
Scoping, evidence, auditor queries and status live in one place. No email chains, no spreadsheet trackers.
Auditor sign-off
Praxis-Q auditors review inside the same workflow, so review rounds shrink and the certificate issues sooner.
Why Source Code Analysis Matters
Vulnerabilities discovered during code review cost 6-10× less to remediate than those found in production. Praxis-Q's source code analysis prevents the same security flaws from shipping release after release by catching issues at the cheapest stage—development. Our hybrid approach balances speed (SAST automation) with precision (expert manual review), eliminating false positives while ensuring no critical vulnerability slips through. For organizations in regulated sectors like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, secure code review is non-negotiable. We align findings with OWASP Top 10, CWE rankings, and compliance frameworks, giving you both immediate actionable fixes and long-term security posture improvement.
SAST + Manual Review: The Dual-Method Advantage
Automated static analysis tools excel at pattern matching—they identify common injection flaws, buffer overflows, and hardcoded credentials instantly. However, they generate false positives and miss business logic vulnerabilities embedded in architecture decisions. Praxis-Q combines both: SAST tools scan your entire codebase for known vulnerability patterns, then our expert reviewers manually inspect critical security controls, authentication flows, data handling, and third-party integrations. This combination delivers comprehensive coverage without alert fatigue. Manual review specifically uncovers privilege escalation risks, insecure cryptography implementations, and race conditions that require contextual understanding of your application's purpose and data sensitivity.
Complete Language & Framework Coverage
Praxis-Q supports 10+ programming languages: Java, Python, Node.js, PHP, .NET/C#, Go, Ruby, JavaScript, TypeScript, and emerging stacks. Each language presents unique security risks—Java faces deserialization attacks, Python struggles with type safety, Node.js has npm supply chain vulnerabilities. Our analysts understand language-specific secure coding patterns and conduct reviews accordingly. We assess framework-level risks (Django, Spring Boot, Express, Laravel) alongside custom code, evaluating configuration security, dependency versions, and known CVEs. Whether your codebase is monolithic or microservices-based, we provide language-appropriate remediation guidance developers actually implement.
Actionable Reports & Developer Training
Praxis-Q's source code analysis reports transcend typical vulnerability lists. Each finding includes proof-of-concept exploitation context, code-level remediation examples, and risk scoring tied to business impact. Reports categorize issues by severity and remediation effort, enabling prioritized fix scheduling. We include anti-pattern detection (overly permissive access controls, missing input validation) and third-party library assessment, identifying outdated or vulnerable dependencies. Every engagement includes developer training sessions explaining discovered vulnerabilities and secure coding best practices. This knowledge transfer reduces future vulnerability density and builds internal security awareness across your engineering team.
India-Based Expertise, Global Delivery Speed
Praxis-Q's India headquarters and global delivery model enable our 5-10 day fast-track turnaround for source code analysis. Our expert security analysts—fluent in multiple languages and compliance frameworks—work across geographies to accelerate review without compromising rigor. This model benefits organizations worldwide: startups needing rapid pre-launch reviews, enterprises managing continuous deployment pipelines, and regulated entities requiring documented secure development practices. We maintain consistent quality across regions while respecting timezone flexibility. Our compliance expertise ensures findings align with GDPR, HIPAA, DPDP, ISO 27001, and other regulatory requirements relevant to your deployment jurisdictions.