SOC 2 Audit Canada
SOC 2 Type I & II Readiness for Canadian SaaS & Cloud Vendors
Praxis-Q delivers SOC 2 readiness, control implementation and evidence for Canadian SaaS companies, fintechs and cloud vendors selling to US and enterprise buyers. The formal SOC 2 report is issued by an independent licensed CPA firm; we get you report-ready in weeks.
SOC 2 Canada
SOC 2 Audit Canada
SOC 2 Type I & II Readiness for Canadian SaaS & Cloud Vendors
The Problem
US and Canadian enterprise buyers will not sign without a SOC 2 report. No report means blocked deals, stalled procurement, and lost revenue to compliant competitors.
What We Do
- Readiness
- Scope
- Controls
- Examination
- Report
What You Get
- SOC 2 Type I and Type II readiness
- All 5 Trust Services Criteria
- Report issued by independent licensed CPA firm
- For Canadian SaaS selling to US enterprise
- ISO 27001 to SOC 2 control mapping
- Quebec Law 25 and PIPEDA alignment
- Vendor questionnaire and due-diligence support
- Fast-track Type 1 in weeks
Why weeks, not months
AI-assisted evidence review, one client portal
Every SOC 2 Canada engagement runs on the Praxis-Q compliance platform. You upload evidence per control, AI scores it against the requirement, and your auditor reviews in the same workflow — from scoping through to the issued, publicly verifiable certificate.
AI evidence scoring
Every upload is scored against the control before an auditor sees it — gaps surface in minutes, not at the review meeting.
One client portal
Scoping, evidence, auditor queries and status live in one place. No email chains, no spreadsheet trackers.
Auditor sign-off
Praxis-Q auditors review inside the same workflow, so review rounds shrink and the certificate issues sooner.
Scoping: Type I vs Type II, and which Trust Services Criteria
Most enterprise buyers specifically require Type II (controls tested over a period, typically 6-12 months) rather than Type I (a point-in-time design assessment), and security is mandatory while the other four criteria are added based on what your product actually does — a data-processing platform usually needs processing integrity, and anyone handling personal data typically adds the privacy criterion.
Readiness assessment and gap remediation
We run a full gap assessment against the chosen Trust Services Criteria, build or tighten the missing policies and technical controls (access reviews, change management, vendor risk assessments, encryption, logging and monitoring), and set up the evidence-collection process the audit period will run against.
Evidence collection over the audit period
For a Type II report, evidence has to be collected continuously over the observation window, not assembled retroactively — we set up the collection cadence (access review logs, change tickets, incident records, vendor assessments) so nothing is missing when the audit period closes.
Coordinating the CPA attestation
We work directly with our partner CPA firm through the fieldwork, testing, and report drafting, managing findings and remediation before the final report is issued — keeping the whole process on one timeline instead of a handoff that stalls at the CPA stage.
Aligning SOC 2 evidence with PIPEDA and Law 25
Where the organisation also needs to demonstrate PIPEDA or Law 25 compliance, we map the SOC 2 control evidence directly to those frameworks' safeguards requirements so the same audit trail supports both, rather than running separate privacy and security compliance tracks.